A Rare Variant of Zinner Syndrome Involving Ectopic Ureteral Implantation into the Seminal Vesicle Causing Recurrent Epididymitis.

Zinner syndrome is a rare congenital anomaly characterized by a triad of renal dysgenesis/agenesis, cysts in the ipsilateral seminal vesicle, and ejaculatory duct obstruction. Though often diagnosed in infancy, the diagnoses can be incidentally found in adults who present with nonspecific genitourinary symptoms including dysuria, ejaculatory dysfunction, or genital pain. We present an unusual case of a 29-year-old male patient who presented to the emergency department with recurrent testicular pain and hematospermia and was found to have an atrophic right kidney with an ectopic ureter implanting into a cystic seminal vesicle. These findings were consistent with a rare subvariant of Zinner syndrome only previously described four times in the literature. We performed a robotic-assisted laparoscopic ectopic nephroureterectomy with sparing of his seminal vesicle. To our knowledge, this is the first report to describe the safe and effective use of robotic surgery in this setting to remove affected anatomy while preserving the patient's seminal vesicle.

Is size in the eye of the beholder? Visual estimation of penis size among transgender and cisgender people and implications for genital gender-affirming surgery and sexual medicine.

BACKGROUND: Transgender men (TM) seeking gender-affirming phalloplasty and transgender women (TW) seeking vaginoplasty and desiring insertive intercourse must consider penis size. Evidence has shown that, at least among cisgender men (CM), penile dimensions tend to be poorly estimated. In transgender patients desiring gender-affirming surgery, inaccuracy in estimation of penis dimensions may lead to unnecessary morbidity: for TW, trauma to the neovagina; for TM with excess girth, an inability to insert. Studies on the accuracy with which transgender and cisgender patients estimate penis size are limited. AIM: To assess the degree of accuracy with which CM and CW, as well as TM and TW, visually estimate the size of the human penis, including length, width, and girth. METHODS: There were 142 participants included (25 TM, 47 TW, 30 CM, and 40 CW; net mean ± SD age, 36.6 ± 11.2 years). Participants were shown these models and asked to estimate length, width, and midshaft girth by visual inspection of 6 realistic models of a penis and scrotum of varying lengths and widths. We evaluated the accuracy of the visual measurements by comparing mean perceived dimensions with the actual dimensions of each model. OUTCOMES: We used a multivariate model of all 3 bias dimensions to test for differences in average bias among gender groups (CM, CW, TM, and TW). RESULTS: TM significantly overestimated length across the longest models. TW significantly overestimated length in the longer 3 models. All groups except for TM significantly underestimated girth in at least 1 model. No groups significantly underestimated width. CM, CW, and TM significantly overestimated width in all 6 models. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: When transgender patients use numbers to express penis size (either in neophallus or vaginal depth based on perceived partner size), the result is likely to be larger than expected. Use of realistic penis models as a decision-making tool may help manage patient expectations and surgery decision making preoperatively and improve postoperative patient satisfaction and safety. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess visual estimation in penis size in TM and CM, as well as TW and CW. The penile models in our study were shown side by side and in the flaccid state despite having dimensions more consistent with an erect penis, which may have influenced estimations across all dimensions. CONCLUSION: Men and women (cisgender and transgender) tend to significantly overestimate penis length and width.

Simultaneous Bladder Drainage via Suprapubic and Urethral Catheters: Which Drains More Completely and Why?

Background: Reconstructive urologists often place both a urethral and suprapubic catheter intraoperatively to prevent extravasation of undrained urine across anastomosis sutures. As no consensus exists on which catheter drains the bladder more completely, many surgeons leave one catheter to gravity drainage and cap the other postoperatively. We sought to identify differences in catheter urine outflow during dual bladder drainage with suprapubic and urethral catheters in postoperative urology patients. Methods: Urine output (UOP) from transgender men who underwent Stage II Phalloplasty with urethral lengthening was retrospectively reviewed. Both 16 French urethral and suprapubic catheters were placed to gravity drainage postoperatively. Urine output from each catheter was recorded separately, twice daily. Mixed model regression modeling tested for differences in urine output by time of day (day/night) and activity status (Bedrest: Postop Day 0-2, Ambulatory: Postop Day 3+). Results: The aggregate number of 12-hour shift urine output observations was 250 (125 for urethral and 125 for suprapubic catheters) across 14 inpatients. Suprapubic catheters had a mean 410 ml higher output than urethral catheters per 12-hour shift (p=0.002; 95% CI: 185, 636 ml). During daytime, Suprapubic catheters demonstrated higher UOP than urethral catheters per 12-hour shift (Estimated Difference: 464 ml; p=0.002; 95% CI: 211, 718 ml). During nighttime, a similar phenomenon was observed (Estimated Difference: 356 ml; p=0.009; 95% CI: 104, 606 ml). When comparing mean UOP from each catheter during the Bedrest Phase, suprapubic catheters averaged an estimated 295 ml higher UOP compared to urethral catheters per 12-hour shift with a trend toward statistical significance (p=0.052; 95% CI -3, 594 ml). During the Ambulatory Phase, mean suprapubic catheter UOP was an estimated 472 ml higher than urethral catheters per 12-hour shift (p=0.009; 95% CI 142, 802 ml). Conclusions: Simultaneous bladder drainage with urethral and suprapubic catheters shows greater drainage from the suprapubic catheter (35% vs 65%). When using two catheters, both can be placed to gravity to maximize bladder drainage as the suprapubic catheter can drain residual urine not adequately drained by the urethral catheter.

Shallow-depth vaginoplasty: preoperative goals, postoperative satisfaction, and why shallow-depth vaginoplasty should be offered as a standard feminizing genital gender-affirming surgery option.

BACKGROUND: Shallow-depth vaginoplasty (SDV), also referred to as vaginoplasty without creation of a vaginal canal, is an understudied alternative to full-depth vaginoplasty (FDV), or vaginoplasty with creation of a vaginal canal. SDV is associated with fewer short- and long-term risks and shorter recovery, and does not require a lifelong commitment to vaginal dilation and douching. AIM: To describe a surgical technique for SDV that creates a dimpled introitus, together with clinical outcomes, decision-making prioritization, and satisfaction data. We hypothesize that SDV patients prioritize comparable appearance and sexual function to FDV over shorter-term risk factors, and experience high satisfaction. METHODS: We describe (1) a surgical technique for SDV; (2) the proportion of patients who underwent SDV vs. FDV, with SDV complication rates; and (3) the results of an anonymous, electronic questionnaire administered via Qualtrics that assessed SDV patient demographics, terminology preferences, prioritization of decision-guiding factors for choosing SDV over FDV, and postoperative satisfaction across various domains. OUTCOMES: A total of 110 patients underwent primary feminizing genital gender-affirming surgery at a single institution between April 2017 and July 2022: 35 (32%) of 110 underwent SDV and 75 (68%) underwent FDV. The 35 SDV patients were invited to answer the study questionnaire, of which 29 (83%) completed it (mean age 51.9 ± 16.7 years, mean body mass index 27.3 ± 5.3 kg/m2). RESULTS: All but one survey respondent met one or more of the following characteristics: (1) ≥40 years of age, (2) exclusively feminine-identifying sexual partners, and/or (3) significant aversion to performing long-term vaginal dilation and douching. Ranking of 8 decision-guiding factors revealed prioritization of long-term over short-term outcomes. Postoperatively, patients reported high satisfaction across all 3 domains. When asked if they had to choose between SDV and FDV over again, 86% reported that they would choose SDV. While 14% would choose FDV, all but one reported new interest in receptive vaginal intercourse due to finding masculine-identifying partners post-SDV surgery. A total of 27% of SDV patients experienced complications that required additional surgeries; 82% of complications were related to urinary spraying. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: SDV is a lower-risk alternative to FDV and is associated with reduced postoperative maintenance and high postoperative satisfaction. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: This study describes the clinical outcomes of the largest documented cohort of patients to undergo SDV to date. Limitations include recall bias due to the retrospective survey and use of nonvalidated questions attributed to the paucity of validated gender-affirming surgery questionnaires. CONCLUSION: SDV's appeal to a large subset of patients (32% in this study), low complication rate, high satisfaction, and low decisional regret suggests that this surgical option should be offered to all patients seeking feminizing genital gender-affirming surgery.

Residency graduates should not be expected to perform hypospadias repair without fellowship training: Results from a survey of SPU membership.

BACKGROUND: Trainee autonomy has eroded over time as surgery has become more subspecialized and as attending oversight has increased, causing many trainees to seek additional fellowship training beyond residency. Less clear is whether there are cases that attendings view as "fellowship-level" or "privileged" cases in which resident-level trainees should not have high levels of autonomy due to complexity or high-stakes outcomes. OBJECTIVE: We sought to better understand current attitudes and practices with regards to trainee autonomy in hypospadias repair as it represents a high complexity procedure within pediatric urology. STUDY DESIGN: We administered a RedCap survey to the SPU membership, asking respondents to describe the level of autonomy afforded to trainees in various types of hypospadias repair (distal, midshaft, proximal, perineal) as measured by the Zwisch scale. The Zwisch scale describes the role of the attending in the attending-trainee relationship in a low-to-high trainee autonomy fashion: show and tell; active help; passive help; supervision only. RESULTS: 177 of 761 (23%) unique recipients completed our survey and 174 of 177 (98%) of respondents felt that trainees should not perform hypospadias repair independently in practice without additional fellowship training. Among pediatric urologists who train residents, trainee autonomy as measured by the Zwisch scale decreased as the type of hypospadias repair moved from distal to proximal. DISCUSSION: There was near unanimous agreement among respondents that urology trainees should not perform hypospadias repair in practice without additional pediatric urology fellowship training, and that current practice affords little trainee autonomy in hypospadias repair at the resident level. These findings introduce a new wrinkle into the issue of trainee autonomy: cases in which trainees perhaps should not have autonomy. Concurrently, the concern with such findings is that this intentional lack of autonomy may extend to other urologic procedures that one would expect trainees to be able to perform independently. CONCLUSION: Urology trainees are not expected to be able to perform hypospadias in practice without additional training. This raises the question that there may be other such procedures in urology, and if so, should we as instructors, be forthcoming about the limitations of urology residency training to set appropriate trainee expectations?

Anatomic maps of erogenous sensation and pleasure in the penis: are there difference between circumcised and uncircumcised men?

BACKGROUND: The effects of male circumcision on sexual function remain controversial. Heterogeneity across previous studies and low-quality scientific evidence have resulted in poor understanding of the effects of circumcision on erogenous sensation of the penis and orgasm function. AIM: In this study we sought to describe and assess differences in erogenous genital sensation and reported orgasm function in circumcised compared with uncircumcised men. METHODS: Adult male subjects who were recruited on a paid anonymous online survey platform were shown illustrations of 12 anatomic regions of the penis. Subjects were prompted to designate regions as pleasurable when touched during partnered sex and to rate each on a 1-10 scale, with higher erogeneity scores correlating with greater pleasure. Subjects were also asked to characterize their orgasms across 6 experiential domains. OUTCOMES: Outcomes were differences between circumcised and uncircumcised men in the probabilities that regions would be designated as pleasurable, average pleasure scores, and self-reported orgasm parameters. RESULTS: In total, 227 circumcised (mean [SD] age 46.6 [17.7] years) and 175 uncircumcised men (47.8 [18.1] years) completed the survey. There were no significant differences in average ratings across all regions between circumcised and uncircumcised men. However, significantly more circumcised men reported preferences for the tip of the penis (38% vs 17%, P = .02) and the middle third of the ventral penile shaft (63% vs 48%, P = .04). Additionally, there were no significant differences in orgasm quality and function across all queried domains between circumcised and uncircumcised cohorts. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Our findings suggest that circumcision does not change how men describe erogenous genital sensation or how they experience orgasm. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: In this study we expanded upon existing literature regarding comparison of sexual function in circumcised and uncircumcised men in its scale and investigation of diverse domains. Limitations include the survey format of data collection. CONCLUSION: We found no differences in reported erogenous ratings or orgasm function between circumcised and uncircumcised men. These findings suggest that male circumcision does not negatively impact penile erogeneity or orgasm function.

Effects of Gender-affirming Hormone Therapy on Orgasm Function of Transgender Men and Women: A Long Term Follow Up.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reported changes in orgasm quality and function of transgender men (TM) and transgender women (TW) after commencing gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT). METHODS: We queried potential changes in orgasm function before and after commencing GAHT (minimum 1 year) among 130 consecutive TW and 33 TM. We queried the following domains under a uniform condition (masturbation): (1) Lead-time to reach orgasm, (2) Duration of orgasm, (3) Body location of orgasm sensation, (4) Description of orgasm as either a single or multiple-peak event, (5) Duration of post-orgasm refractory period, and (6) Overall satisfaction with orgasm quality. RESULTS: Within groups by gender, TW and TM reported similar responses to our inventory before starting GAHT. After commencing GAHT, TW reported notable changes in orgasm function: increase in lead-time necessary to reach orgasm, orgasm duration, and overall orgasm satisfaction. Similarly, TM reported an increase in duration of orgasm and increased overall satisfaction with orgasm quality. Over half of the TW reported experiencing orgasms in new/additional body locations. Additionally, prior to commencing GAHT, the majority of TM and TW patients reported their orgasms as a short, single-peak event but following GAHT these same patients reported longer and protracted multiple-peak orgasms. CONCLUSIONS: GAHT has the potential to positively improve orgasm quality for transgender patients undergoing gender transition. It is important to share such data with patients prospectively before treatments.

Penile and Scrotal Skin Measurements to Predict Final Vaginal Depth With Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty.

INTRODUCTION: No nomogram exists to predict maximum achievable neovaginal depth before penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV) based on available penile & scrotal skin (SS). Maximal depth is important to patients and is determined by available skin and available anatomic space within the pelvis and varies with surgical technique. AIM: We endeavored to create a nomogram to predict expected postoperative vaginal depth. METHODS: Retrospective review of all patients undergoing primary PIV at a single institution from June 2017 to February 2020 (n = 60). Pre-op: Dorsal penile and midline scrotal skin length were measured. Intra-op: Tubularized scrotal skin length measured on a dilator. Immediate post-op: Final vaginal depth measured with a dilator. OUTCOMES: The amount of available penile and scrotal skin was not associated with vaginal depth. The only variable that did significantly increase depth was the use of penile + scrotal skin, as compared to penile skin alone. (P < .001) RESULTS: In patients who underwent PIV-SS, the final vaginal depth (13.3 ± 1.9 cm) was 87% of pre-op measured penile skin length (15.3 ±- 3.0 cm). In patients who underwent PIV+SS, pre-op penile skin length was 11.1 ± 4.7±cm and pre-op midline scrotal length was 22.8 ± 2.6 cm. with a final post-op vaginal canal depth of 15.2 ± 1.3 cm. In 45/46 (98%) surgeries utilizing SS grafts, SS tube length exceeded the length necessary to achieve maximal vaginal depth, and required trimming and discard. Given that in most cases there was an excess of SS, final post-op depth equaled the maximal vaginal depth that could be surgically dissected, and was not limited by the amount of available skin. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Our findings suggest that for most patients it should not be necessary to include additional tissue sources (eg, peritoneum) to create a vaginal canal during primary vaginoplasty. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Any penile skin that was discarded due to poor quality (eg, tight phimosis, poor viability) was not measured and accounted for. This likely resulted in a slight overestimation of the contribution of the penile skin to the final vaginal depth, but did not change the overall finding that final depth was not limited by available skin. CONCLUSION: SS grafts, when harvested and tubularized using optimized technique, supplied an excess of skin necessary to line a vaginal canal space of maximal achievable depth. We found that additional tissue sources can, instead, be reserved for future salvage surgery if it becomes necessary to augment depth. Smith SM, Yuan N, Stelmar J, et al. Penile and Scrotal Skin Measurements to Predict Final Vaginal Depth With Penile Inversion Vaginoplasty. Sex Med 2022;10:100569.

YouTube as a source for information on newborn male circumcision: Is YouTube a reliable patient resource?

INTRODUCTION: YouTube is the most popular open access media-sharing platform and is the second most visited websites worldwide. However, due to a lack of peer-review, YouTube is largely unregulated and can be susceptible to the spread of biased or misleading information. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality and potential bias of videos pertaining to newborn male circumcision (NMC) on YouTube. MATERIALS & METHODS: A YouTube search was performed on August 27, 2021 using the search term 'circumcision', and the top 100 videos were analyzed by two independent reviewers. Videos were categorized into groupings based on their source, and each video was evaluated for bias and was determined to be either pro-circumcision, anti-circumcision or neutral. Video quality was assessed using the DISCERN instrument (1-5 scale) and the Global Quality Scale (GQS) (1-5 scale). Video popularity was measured using the video power index (VPI). RESULTS: We found that the overall quality of videos on YouTube pertaining to NMC is generally low (DISCERN: 2.9 ± 0.7, GQS: 2.9 ± 1.1). When describing potential bias, 56% of videos were neutral and 44% were biased, of which 30% being anti-circumcision and 14% being pro-circumcision. Videos which were neutral, produced by health channels, or which featured physicians were associated with the highest quality ratings. However, when correlating total video views and likes with our quality assessments, we observed a significant negative correlation between the overall popularity of a video and its DISCERN (ρ = -0.297, p = 0.031) and GQS quality ratings (ρ = -0.274, p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: Information pertaining to NMC on YouTube is generally of low quality and has a high potential for bias. Lower quality content is overrepresented on YouTube and tended to be more popular than higher quality content. Patients and their families should be cautious when accessing YouTube for health information pertaining to NMC.

Comparison of Permanent Hair Removal Procedures before Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty: Why We Should Consider Laser Hair Removal as a First-Line Treatment for Patients Who Meet Criteria.

INTRODUCTION: Permanent genital hair removal is required before gender-affirming vaginoplasty to prevent hair-related complications. No previous studies have directly compared the relative efficacy, costs, and patient experiences with laser hair removal (LHR) vs electrolysis treatments. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) oversight of medical devices is poorly understood and commonly misrepresented, adversely affecting patient care. AIM: This study compares treatment outcomes of electrolysis and LHR for genital hair removal and investigates FDA regulation of electrolysis and LHR devices. METHODS: Penile-inversion vaginoplasty and shallow-depth vaginoplasty patients completed surveys about their preoperative hair removal, including procedure type, number/frequency of sessions, cost, and discomfort. Publicly available FDA-review documents and databases were reviewed. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE: Compared to electrolysis, LHR was associated with greater efficiency, decreased cost, decreased pain, and improved patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Of 52 total (44 full-depth and 8 shallow-depth) vaginoplasty patients, 22 of 52 underwent electrolysis only, 15 of 52 underwent laser only, and 15 of 52 used both techniques. Compared to patients that underwent LHR only, patients that underwent only electrolysis required a significantly greater number of treatment sessions (mean 24.3 electrolysis vs 8.1 LHR sessions, P < .01) and more frequent sessions (every 2.4 weeks for electrolysis vs 5.3 weeks for LHR, P < .01) to complete treatment (defined as absence of re-growth over 2 months). Electrolysis sessions were significantly longer than LHR sessions (152 minutes vs 26 minutes, P < .01). Total treatment costs for electrolysis ($5,161) were significantly greater than for laser ($981, P < .01). Electrolysis was associated with greater pain and significantly increased need for pretreatment analgesia, which further contributed to higher net costs for treatment with electrolysis vs laser. Many LHR and electrolysis devices have been FDA-cleared for safety, but the FDA does not assess or compare clinical efficacy or efficiency. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: For patients with dark-pigmented hair, providers should consider LHR as the first-line treatment option for preoperative hair removal before gender-affirming vaginoplasty. STRENGTH AND LIMITATIONS: This is the first study to compare electrolysis and LHR for genital hair removal. The discussion addresses FDA review/oversight of devices, which is commonly misrepresented. Limitations include the survey format for data collection. CONCLUSION: When compared with electrolysis, LHR showed greater treatment efficiency (shorter and fewer treatment sessions to complete treatment), less pain, greater tolerability, and lower total cost. Our data suggests that, for patients with dark genital hair, providers should consider recommending laser as the first-line treatment for permanent genital hair removal before vaginoplasty. Yuan N, Feldman A, Chin P, et al. Comparison of Permanent Hair Removal Procedures before Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty: Why We Should Consider Laser Hair Removal as a First-Line Treatment for Patients Who Meet Criteria. Sex Med 2022;10:100545.

A Proposed Inventory to Assess Changes in Orgasm Function of Transgender Patients Following Gender Affirming Treatments: Pilot Study.

INTRODUCTION: While providers generally counsel patients about possible effects of gender affirming treatments, such as gender affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) and gender affirming surgery (GAS), on sexual function - the effects of these treatments on orgasm function and quality are not well understood. AIM: To develop a gender transition orgasm quality inventory based on orgasm function domains transgender patients communicated were important to them. METHODS: We conducted a series of interviews in which we asked transgender patients to describe which factors related to orgasm (ie, orgasm quality and orgasm-related sexual function) were most important to them. This work generated a list of 6 domains which we incorporated into a survey instrument. The 6 domains that our work generated are: (1) Lead-time to reach orgasm, (2) Duration of orgasm, (3) Body location of orgasm sensation; (4) Description of orgasm as either a single or multiple-peak event, (5) Duration of postorgasm refractory period, and (6) Overall satisfaction with orgasm quality. Using this new questionnaire, we queried potential changes in orgasm function before and after commencing GAHT (minimum 1 year) among 130 consecutive transgender women (TW) and 33 transgender men (TM) as a pilot study. RESULTS: Within groups by gender, TW and TM cohorts reported similar responses to our inventory before starting GAHT. After commencing GAHT, TW reported notable changes in orgasm function: increase in lead-time necessary to reach orgasm, orgasm duration, and overall orgasm satisfaction; and decrease in post-orgasm refractory period. Similarly, TM reported an increase in duration of orgasm and increased overall satisfaction with orgasm quality; and a decrease in post-orgasm refractory period. Over half of the TW reported experiencing orgasms in new/additional body locations. Additionally, prior to commencing GAHT, the majority of TM and TW patients reported their orgasms as a short, single-peak event but following GAHT these same patients reported longer and protracted multiple-peak orgasms. CONCLUSION: We have developed a novel questionnaire with the purpose of assessing patient self-reported changes in orgasm function following gender affirming treatments. Findings from our pilot study shows that GAHT has the potential to positively improve sexual function and orgasm quality for transgender patients undergoing gender transition. We encourage future studies to utilize our novel questionnaire to assess potential changes in orgasm function related to various gender affirming procedures. Zaliznyak M, Lauzon M, Stelmar J, et al. A Proposed Inventory to Assess Changes in Orgasm Function of Transgender Patients Following Gender Affirming Treatments: Pilot Study. Sex Med 2022;10:100510.

Mechanical Circulatory Support as a Bridge-to-Transplant Candidacy: When Does It Work?

Durable mechanical circulatory support (dMCS) devices can be offered as a bridge-to-transplant (BTT) or as a bridge-to-candidacy (BTC) strategy for candidates with contraindications to transplant listing, including pulmonary hypertension (BTC-PH), morbid obesity (BTC-Obes), social issues (BTC-Soc), or chronic illness (BTC-Illness). An understanding of the trajectory of BTC patients could guide future triage of advanced heart failure patients who are not candidates for transplantation. We performed a retrospective review all patients who underwent dMCS implantation as either BTT (206 patients) or BTC (114 patients) at our center from January 1, 2010, to March 31, 2020. There was no significant difference in mortality between BTC patients and BTT patients. Compared with the BTT group, significantly more patients in the BTC-PH group were transplanted (81% vs. 63%; p < 0.05) and significantly fewer patients in the BTC-Obes group (44%; p < 0.05) and BTC-Soc group (39%; p < 0.05) were transplanted. Additionally, the readmission rate was higher for those in the BTC-Obes (6.2 vs. 2.1; p < 0.05) and BTC-Soc (3.9 vs. 2.1; p < 0.05) groups. Bridge-to-candidacy patients generally had poorer post-dMCS trajectories than BTT patients. Centers should not be dissuaded from pursuing a BTC strategy for qualified patients; however, careful consideration of potential adverse outcomes is necessary.

Optimal instrument length for transumbilical laparoendoscopic single site (U-LESS) surgery.

The aim of our study was to recommend a novel method for measuring the distance from the umbilicus to intra-abdominal organs, as well as recommend an instrument length that would accommodate transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site (U-LESS) surgeries to these areas. From CT scans of 50 men and 50 women, we calculated the distance from the umbilicus to 11 intra-abdominal points of interest using two triangles oriented perpendicular to each other. Using known lengths of the triangles, we used the Pythagorean theorem to calculate distances with and without insufflation. Distances were measured from the umbilicus to the xyphoid process, superior most aspect of the spleen, neck of the gallbladder, bifurcation of the descending aorta, adrenal glands, superior pole(s) of the kidneys, inferior most aspect of the inguinal canal, suprapubic margin, and the apex of the prostate (or female bladder neck). We found that an instrument working length of 43 cm would be sufficient to facilitate U-LESS surgery for all of our patients to each of the measured points of interest. The technique described in this paper serves as a useful method by which to measure the distance from the umbilicus to any intra-abdominal point of interest. These measurements would allow surgeons to correctly select instruments with adequate length when planning to perform U-LESS surgery.

How Early in Life do Transgender Adults Begin to Experience Gender Dysphoria? Why This Matters for Patients, Providers, and for Our Healthcare System.

INTRODUCTION: The age at which transgender women (TW) and men (TM) first experience gender dysphoria (GD) has not been reported in a U.S. population of adults seeking genital gender-affirming surgery (gGAS). Because gender is an innate part of identity, we hypothesized that untreated GD would be a part of individuals' earliest memories. Understanding GD onset can help guide providers with when and how to focus care to patients not yet identified as "transgender AIM: (i) Determine the age at which transgender adults seeking gGAS first experience GD (ii) Determine the number of life-years that transgender adults spend living with untreated GD METHODS: During initial consultation for gGAS, we asked patients the earliest age at which they experienced GD and the age at which they had their earliest episodic memory. We also queried history of anxiety, depression, and suicide attempt. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients self-reported their earliest recollections of experiencing GD, earliest memories in general, and history of anxiety, depression, and suicide attempt. RESULTS: Data from 155 TW (mean age 41.3; SD 16.3) and 55 TM (mean age 35.4; SD 10.8) were collected. Most patients (TM: 78%; TW: 73%) reported experiencing GD for the first time between ages 3 and 7 years.  For TM the mean age of onset was 6.17 years; for TW it was 6.71 years. A total of 81% of TW and 80% of TM described their first recollection of GD as one of their earliest memories. Mean years of persistent GD before the start of gender transition were 22.9 (TM) and 27.1 (TW). Rates of depression, anxiety, and suicide ideation decreased following gender transition. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that GD typically manifests in early childhood and persists untreated for many years before individuals commence gender transition. Diagnosis and early management during childhood and adolescence can improve quality of life and survival. Zaliznyak M, Yuan N, Bresee C, et al. How Early in Life do Transgender Adults Begin to Experience Gender Dysphoria? Why This Matters for Patients, Providers, and for Our Healthcare System. Sex Med 2021;9:100448.

Which U.S. States' Medicaid Programs Provide Coverage for Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy and Gender-Affirming Genital Surgery for Transgender Patients?: A State-by-State Review, and a Study Detailing the Patient Experience to Confirm Coverage of Services.

BACKGROUND: To date, a comprehensive state-by-state assessment of transgender transition-related health care coverage for gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) and genital gender-affirming surgery (GAS) has not been reported. AIMS: The aims of this study were 1) to verify which U.S. states' Medicaid systems do/do not cover GAHT and GAS; 2) to assess the ease/difficulty for patients to determine whether GAHT and GAS are Medicaid-covered benefits; and 3) to understand possible state-related predictors of Medicaid coverage for gender-affirming care. METHODS: We reviewed the official Medicaid Handbook and website for all 51 states (+D.C.) and 5 territories to confirm whether GAHT and GAS are covered benefits. When indeterminate, we called the Medicaid office in each state, and for many, Medicaid managed care organizations (MCOs), and individual in-state providers, to confirm coverage. We recorded our experiences, number of, and duration of phone calls to confirm coverage. OUTCOMES: The main outcome was a definitive answer from the state/territory's Medicaid program or MCOs regarding whether GAHT and GAS are/are not covered benefits. Secondary outcome measures included responses we received and the total number/duration of phone calls necessary to confirm coverage. RESULTS: Only 12 of 51 states and 0 of 5 territories featured their policy regarding coverage for GAHT in their Medicaid Handbook/webpages. We confirmed that 34 of 51 state Medicaid programs do cover GAHT, whereas 9 of 51 states' and 2 of 5 territories' do not. We could not confirm coverage of GAHT in 8 of 51 states and 3 of 5 territories. Only 26 of 51 states and 0 of 5 territories featured their policy regarding coverage for GAS in their Medicaid Handbook/webpages. We confirmed that 25 of 51 state Medicaid programs do cover GAS, whereas 22 of 51 states' and 3 of 5 territories' do not. We could not confirm coverage of GAS in 4 of 51 states and 2 of 5 territories. Up to 12 calls, lasting up to 125 minutes, were required to confirm coverage for GAHT/GAS. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Our findings indicate that important health care access barriers/disparities exist today and warrant improvement. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive assessment of transgender transition-related health care coverage. Limitations include possible bias, as it could be that we were more persistent than actual patients would be to determine service coverage, and a lack of specificity regarding which specific hormone formulations or procedures are/are not covered. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that only 34 of 51 (67%) states' Medicaid programs include GAHT and 25 of 51 (49%) include GAS as covered benefits. Our experience suggests that the process to confirm coverage can be especially time-consuming and frustrating for patients. Zaliznyak M, Jung EE, Bresee C, et al. Which U.S. States' Medicaid Programs Provide Coverage for Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy and Genital Gender-Affirming Surgery for Transgender Patients?: A State-by-State Review, and a Study Detailing the Patient Experience to Confirm Coverage of Service. J Sex Med 2021;18:410-422.

Use of right colon vaginoplasty in gender affirming surgery: proposed advantages, review of technique, and outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Various methods have been described to create a functional neovagina with feminizing (male-to-female) gender affirming surgery. Intestinal vaginoplasty using ileal or colon segments confers natural mucus production and greater canal depth with primary vaginoplasty. In this work we describe an alternative approach to primary and salvage vaginoplasty using right colon. We focus on relative advantages compared to use of other bowel segments, and we review patient outcomes. METHODS: Transgender women who had previously undergone primary vaginoplasty underwent laparoscopic right colon vaginoplasty at our center between 12/2017 and 7/2019. Demographic, medical, outcome, and satisfaction data was collected and retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-two consecutive transgender women patients underwent laparoscopic right colon vaginoplasty. Mean age was 39.3 years. There were two intraoperative complications:1 injury of the ileocolic pedicle, and 1 minor bladder injury. Four of 22 patients (18.2%) had short-term complications (< 30 days): 3 had postoperative ileus/small bowel obstruction and 1 had intra-abdominal hemorrhage. All were managed conservatively. Six of 22 patients (27.3%) experienced a total of 14 long-term complications (> 30 days): 1 developed Crohn's (not involving the neovagina); 1 developed late small bowel obstruction (SBO) (managed conservatively); 5 developed neovagina prolapse; 4 developed stenosis (2 at the vaginal introitus, and 2 had extrinsic obstruction at the recto-vaginal junction (all underwent successful laparoscopic surgical correction); and 3 were diagnosed with diversion neovaginitis (all treated conservatively). All complications were successfully treated with conservative and/or surgical intervention. All (100%) patients reported satisfaction with neovagina function and appearance. CONCLUSION: This is the only outcomes series of transgender women patients who have undergone right colon vaginoplasty, to date. Our study finding suggests that laparoscopic right colon for primary or salvage vaginoplasty has several important advantages over use of Sigmoid colon or Ileum, and is a reliable technique whose complications can be managed successfully, with favorable, satisfactory long-term outcomes.

Impact of the United Network for organ sharing 2018 donor heart allocation system on transplant morbidity and mortality.

BACKGROUND: While the revised UNOS HTx donor allocation system aimed to minimize waitlist mortality by prioritizing more critically ill transplant candidates, there is concern for increased post-transplant morbidity and mortality. We examined the impact of the revised allocation system on waitlist and post-transplant outcomes at a high-volume transplant center. METHODS: One hundred and sixty nine adult patients underwent first-time single-organ HTx one year before (Era 1:79 patients) and after (Era 2:90 patients) implementation of the new allocation system (10/18/2018). Clinical characteristics, waitlist outcomes, and post-transplant morbidity and mortality were compared. RESULTS: Era 2 patients were twice as likely to be transplanted on temporary mechanical circulatory support (43% vs. 19%, p < .0001). While Era 2 waitlist time was shorter (10 vs. 43 days, p < .001), exception status requests (21.1% vs. 17.9%) and waitlist mortality (3.3% vs. 2.2%) were similar. There was no difference in primary graft dysfunction, intensive care unit or hospital length of stay, readmissions, rejection, allograft vasculopathy, or 1-year survival (91.1% vs. 93.7%). CONCLUSIONS: In a high-volume center, the revised HTx allocation system shortened waitlist time with no significant change in waitlist mortality or observed impact on post-transplant outcomes. With careful patient selection, the revised allocation system may optimize waitlist and post-transplant outcomes.

Association of Social Media Presence with Online Physician Ratings and Surgical Volume Among California Urologists: Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Urologists are increasingly using various forms of social media to promote their professional practice and attract patients. Currently, the association of social media on a urologists' practice is unknown. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine whether social media presence is associated with higher online physician ratings and surgical volume among California urologists. METHODS: We sampled 195 California urologists who were rated on the ProPublica Surgeon Scorecard website. We obtained information on professional use of online social media (Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, blog, and YouTube) in 2014 and defined social media presence as a binary variable (yes/no) for use of an individual platform or any platform. We collected data on online physician ratings across websites (Yelp, Healthgrades, Vitals, RateMD, and UCompareHealthcare) and calculated the mean physician ratings across all websites as an average weighted by the number of reviews. We then collected data on surgical volume for radical prostatectomy from the ProPublica Surgeon Scorecard website. We used multivariable linear regression to determine the association of social media presence with physician ratings and surgical volume. RESULTS: Among our sample of 195 urologists, 62 (32%) were active on some form of social media. Social media presence on any platform was associated with a slightly higher mean physician rating (ß coefficient: .3; 95% CI 0.03-0.5; P=.05). However, only YouTube was associated with higher physician ratings (ß coefficient: .3; 95% CI 0.2-0.5; P=.04). Social media presence on YouTube was strongly associated with increased radical prostatectomy volume (ß coefficient: 7.4; 95% CI 0.3-14.5; P=.04). Social media presence on any platform was associated with increased radical prostatectomy volume (ß coefficient: 7.1; 95% CI -0.7 to 14.2; P=.05). CONCLUSIONS: Urologists' use of social media, especially YouTube, is associated with a modest increase in physician ratings and prostatectomy volume. Although a majority of urologists are not currently active on social media, patients may be more inclined to endorse and choose subspecialist urologists who post videos of their surgical technique.